Traffic arrives and few of it buys. This finds exactly where they leave.

A store can look clean and still lose buyers at specific, findable points: shipping revealed too late, a forced account, a form that is fine on desktop and punishing on a phone, a product page that never answers the one question a buyer needed answered. Looking good and converting are different outcomes. This diagnostic exists to locate the exact steps where people leave, so your effort shifts away from changing things that merely look wrong and toward fixing what is actually costing you sales.

This is the diagnosis, not the treatment. It finds and ranks exactly where your store loses buyers and what each leak is likely costing. A conversion program is the separate, ongoing work of fixing and testing those points. We keep the two apart on purpose, because paying to fix a leak nobody has located is how most conversion budgets get wasted. Many owners take the diagnostic, hand the ranked list to their own developer, and never need the program at all.

No. A specialist completes real purchase attempts on your store, reads the session evidence and the funnel data, writes the diagnosis, and reviews the whole document before delivery. Technology speeds up how fast and precisely we read your store, but the judgement, the ranking, and the reasoning are a specialist's. Every deliverable is directed by a specialist and reviewed before delivery. The proof is in the deliverable: the recorded walkthroughs, the step-tied findings, and the reasoning behind each priority are things a bare export never contains.

No system can promise a specific conversion number, because conversion depends on your prices, product, audience, and dozens of factors no outside firm controls. We commit to finding where your store loses buyers, ranking the leaks by what they plausibly cost, and reporting plainly, including where a finding is directional rather than certain. The work diagnoses and prioritizes.

For the fullest read, yes, view access to your analytics lets us attach real drop-off figures to each step of the funnel, which sharpens the ranking considerably. Where that access is not available, we still diagnose the path through real purchase walkthroughs, and mark the affected findings as directional rather than quantified. The report is explicit about which findings are backed by data and which are expert judgement, so the strength of each one is always clear.

Yes. We do the work on your live store and its analytics, from the buyer's actual purchase path, which is the same wherever the specialist sits. Raveneye Global is operated by RavenGroup Global Tech Private Limited and bills in USD. We complete real purchase attempts at your business's US locale, on the devices and browsers your buyers use, and stamp the report with exactly what it was run against, so you see the conditions for yourself.

We score each finding by how much of the lost conversion it plausibly explains against how hard it is to fix, then order it most valuable first. Where your analytics support a real drop-off figure for a step, that figure drives the ranking; where they do not, we mark the finding directional and rank it on documented impact from large-scale checkout research and on expert reading. The result is an ordered register, not a flat list, so the first fix is the one most likely to pay.

It varies by store. As a sense of scale, the Baymard Institute, from ten years of large-scale checkout testing, reports that the average large ecommerce site can gain a 35.26 percent lift in conversion from better checkout design, against a 2026 average cart abandonment rate of 70.22 percent. That is an industry figure, not a promise about your specific store. The real number depends on where your specific leaks are, which is exactly what the diagnostic measures before any change is proposed.